diverport is in itself a sufficient reason for taking measures to prevent any similar uncertainty in the future.
3. He might be argued that if the Chief Justice had before 1864 the right to deal in Chambers with the disposal of matters arising in the ordinary jurisdiction of the Court, the 4th section of the Order of 1864 would have given him a similar right in Bankruptcy matters; the fact that he had this right in Bankruptcy matters might have made a rule under section 7 (1) unnecessary. Presumably this view could be taken in determining what matters could be taken in Chambers.
The question whether decisions in Chambers should be taken remains. Except that there is a right in the...
4. The question will remain whether in the absence of such a rule the Chief Justice and other Judges are entitled to determine at their discretion whether they will take or not take particular matters in Chambers.
The question is whether in the absence of such a rule the right of sitting in Chambers can be exercised and carried out in the discharge of any business at all, e.g. in the C.
5. It is most undesirable that a state of uncertainty should prevail in the Administration of justice, and you should therefore cable the conflicting views at once.
diverport is in itself a Sufficient wason for taking measures to prevent any
Similar uncutainty in the future
3. He snight
be
argued that
if the Chief Justice harde before 1964 the right to dit
in Chanter for the disposne
of inkilven similar matter
within
arising in the ordinary jurisdiction
of the Cout, the 4th duction of the
Order scf1864 would have
given him a similar rishable that having this righet
in Bankomplety matters; the
This view power conce
might hav
make a rule unde
duction 7 (1). Presenting not determine what matter
titan but
Ihmee
Responly be taken in
The question whether decomber Chambers.
Excis that eight in the
4. The question haven will remain whether in the
422
"Abrener of such a rule the
432
Chief Justin Jame diner 1873
Johathen both Judge
are,
Entitled to determine at
disertion whether they will
will go take or particular
Matter shoulde or
math in
indend
should not be taken
(hambus,
•
ortion whether in the absen
of sack wh the sight of witting
in Chambers can be exersidad in they denis same there an carried with in the Digitale Rowen business at to dispose of any
there
all. Haple in the C.
5. It is most undesirable that
a state of uncertainty Shoes
mather Communitat
wish upon any with the Administration of justion.
and you Khould them for Faber at once emaile the confhiting
eci
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.